Medical Panels: Prefabricated Integrated Solution vs. On-Site Assembled System – How the Choice Impacts Hospital Room Project Risks and Success
🩺 Medical Panels: Prefabricated Integrated Solution vs. On-Site Assembled System – How the Choice Impacts Hospital Room Project Risks and Success
Recommendations for designers of critical medical infrastructure to avoid hidden costs, delays, and safety hazards.
🏥 Introduction: The Room as a Therapeutic Instrument
The modern hospital room is more than just four walls. It is a high-tech environment where every detail—air exchange, light, noise, and above all, technical infrastructure—affects both patient health and treatment outcomes. One of the most critical decisions for architects and designers in such a space concerns the integration of medical gases, electricity, data, and equipment into compact medical panels. Should one choose an integrated solution (e.g., a prefabricated, factory-integrated medical panel) or panels assembled on-site from various components? This choice determines the project's costs, schedule, and—most importantly—the ultimate satisfaction of the end-user's needs.
1. 📊 A Detailed Comparison of Two Approaches: A Medical Panel is More Than a Price Tag
| Criterion | Prefabricated Integrated Solution (e.g., REXUMA integrated medical panels) | On-Site Assembled System |
| 🎨 Design | Requires early involvement. Design is standardized, tested, and validated by the manufacturer. Reduces coordination needs. | Greater apparent flexibility, but requires intensive coordination between different parties. High risk of drawing conflicts. |
| ⚙️
Installation
| Faster, cleaner "trouble-free" installation. Minimal disruption to hospital activities. | Long, dusty, and noisy process. Coordination of multiple subcontractors, high risk of faults. |
| ⚠️ Reliability & Safety | High, as the system is factory-tested (e.g., compliance with standard IEC 60601-1). Lower risk of human connection errors. | Depends on the skill and precision of each installer. High risk of errors discovered only during commissioning. |
| 📋 Responsibility | SINGLE POINT OF RESPONSIBILITY. The manufacturer is responsible for the entire medical panel system—from assembly to warranty. | Responsibility is diffused. A "blame game" arises in case of failure, leading to lengthy downtimes. |
| 🔧 Subsequent Maintenance | Simple and clear. One contract, one service provider, spare parts, and documentation from a single source. | Complex. The hospital must coordinate different service providers itself. Troubleshooting is time-consuming. |
| 💰 Budget Control | Fixed cost at an early stage. Lower risk of hidden costs (coordination, rework). | Initial price may be lower, but hidden costs (delays, rework) are often greater. |
| 🔄 Flexibility | Moderate. Changes are made in cooperation with the manufacturer. Modernization is systematic. | Theoretically flexible, but actual changes are often expensive and disruptive to operations. |
2. ⚠️ Risk Analysis: What Can Go Wrong with an On-Site Assembled Medical Panel System?
Here are the specific hazards that architects and designers should anticipate.
⚡ Integration Risk (The Biggest!): Components from different suppliers may not work together ideally (e.g., electromagnetic interference). This can cause unstable operation of devices.
🦠 Compromised Infection Control During Construction: A prolonged on-site construction period brings dust and microbes into hospital rooms, contradicting the elevated requirements of operating rooms.
❌ Human Error During Installation: The risk of incorrect connections is much higher when several different teams make complex connections hastily in compact environments.
📈 Schedule Overrun and Cascade Effect: A delay in one subcontractor's work leads to delays in all dependent tasks. This can postpone the completion of the entire room by weeks.
📄 Inadequate Documentation: The final "as-built" documentation may not reflect actual changes, making future maintenance extremely difficult.
3. ✅ Design Guidelines and Risk Mitigation Strategies
How can architects and designers steer the process and minimize risks?
🤝 Apply Early Integrated Design: Involve the prefabricated solution supplier or a specialist consultant already in the concept phase. This ensures technical requirements are in harmony with the architectural solution.
🧪 Demand Tested Systems: Use the supplier's Factory Acceptance Test (FAT) results. This means the system is assembled and tested in the factory before delivery to the site.
🎯 Create a Clear Responsibility Matrix: When drafting contracts, strive wherever possible to reach a Single Point of Responsibility for the entire medical infrastructure system.
🏗️ Use Mock-ups and Simulations: Build a real or virtual room prototype. This allows for the identification of design and functional problems at an early stage.
📦 Consider the Philosophy of Modular Construction: Modular design is not just about elements, but a process. It brings speed, factory-controlled quality, and minimal disruption to critical spaces.
4. 🎯 How to Make the Right Choice? Conclusions for the Architect.
The choice of medical panels is not black and white but leans strongly in favor of the factory-made integrated solution for critical spaces (operating rooms, ICUs, maternity wards).
✅ CHOOSE THE INTEGRATED SOLUTION if: The goal is to minimize risk, ensure adherence to budget and schedule, maximize patient safety, and maintain the hospital's operational continuity during construction.
⚖️ Consider an on-site assembled system only if: It is a very unique, experimental project, or the budget is absolutely limited and additional resources are allocated for risk management.
💡 Final Thought – The Role of the Architect/Designer in the Choice:
"In a hospital, assembling a medical panel on-site from components requires cooperation between the End User (HOSPITAL) - Design Firm - Main Contractor - Electrical Installation Company - Low-Current Installation Company - Gas Works Company... Procurement of factory-made panels according to the project should ideally belong to a single contractor's procurement package. This makes the process significantly clearer and the quality better."
This precise overview significantly simplifies logistics, contractual and liability relationships, making the project more manageable. The role of the architect and designer is precisely to highlight and advocate for the advantages of such efficient process solutions.
In summary, the task of today's hospital architect/designer is not only to design the space and its technical systems but to ensure the complex technical system functions in reality. The right approach to integrating medical systems—preferring integrated solutions—is the key to a successful, safe, and on-time, on-budget project.
📞 Ask for expert advice: +372 5094 786
📧 Write to: riit.tarmo@riittrading.com